Re: Regarding Database Design
From: Michael Austin <maustin_at_firstdbasource.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:09:27 -0500
Message-ID: <du0Ol.10204$im1.2485_at_nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>
Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:58:30 -0500, Michael Austin wrote:
>
>
> It seems that our friend from the story below is back in action:
>
> http://oracle-wtf.blogspot.com/2009/02/consultant.html
>
> De-normalize till you are left with a single, all encompassing table!
> What a novel idea! I wonder why I didn't come to think of that!
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:09:27 -0500
Message-ID: <du0Ol.10204$im1.2485_at_nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>
Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:58:30 -0500, Michael Austin wrote:
>
>> Then LEAVE IT ALONE... it is idiocy or even stupidity to do otherwise >> and you can quote me on that!!!
>
> It seems that our friend from the story below is back in action:
>
> http://oracle-wtf.blogspot.com/2009/02/consultant.html
>
> De-normalize till you are left with a single, all encompassing table!
> What a novel idea! I wonder why I didn't come to think of that!
... probably because there is still gray-matter between your ears that is still functioning and already added the stupid factor to that solution and therefore rejected it before it made it back your conscience level.
>
>
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 16:09:27 CDT