Re: UNDO: 10g-style behaviour in 9.2.0.8?
From: jgar the jorrible <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d62c3aae-5c78-4bf3-99e6-8c3916ad7cbd_at_y34g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 3, 7:29 pm, ca111..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It is my understanding that UNDO works differently in 9.2 and 10.2.
> Size of undo datafiles is fixed, AUTOEXTEND is OFF.
>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d62c3aae-5c78-4bf3-99e6-8c3916ad7cbd_at_y34g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 3, 7:29 pm, ca111..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It is my understanding that UNDO works differently in 9.2 and 10.2.
> Size of undo datafiles is fixed, AUTOEXTEND is OFF.
>
I think the one big difference is the undo retention guarantee.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://www.pcworld.com/article/161819/backup_provider_carbonite_loses_data_sues_vendor.html?tk=rss_newsReceived on Mon Apr 06 2009 - 12:15:18 CDT