Re: Active data guard vs streams/shareplex
From: <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1f07e15c-e537-4d6a-8184-60036e3c715e_at_z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 5, 10:13 am, dk <kigh..._at_bellsouth.net> wrote:
> We currently use sharplex to replicate from a source to a target.
> However with the 11g active dataguard we considering replacing
> shareplex. The question is can the new dataguard serve as a replacement
> for streams/shareplex. The source and target need to be in-sync pretty
> much real time.
>
> Thanks
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1f07e15c-e537-4d6a-8184-60036e3c715e_at_z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
On Apr 5, 10:13 am, dk <kigh..._at_bellsouth.net> wrote:
> We currently use sharplex to replicate from a source to a target.
> However with the 11g active dataguard we considering replacing
> shareplex. The question is can the new dataguard serve as a replacement
> for streams/shareplex. The source and target need to be in-sync pretty
> much real time.
>
> Thanks
FYI http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/htdocs/DataGuardOverview.html
I don't think much has changed with 11g as far as the 3 main choices ( which appear to have been named by marketing folks at oracle ) ... Maximum Protection, Maximum Availability, and Maximum Performance.
The maximum protection is the synchronous configuration. Received on Sun Apr 05 2009 - 12:41:32 CDT