Re: RMAN or Hot Backup

From: John Schaeffer <amerar_at_iwc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <64573dbe-8d16-4b33-91ac-7a630e4a5f8c_at_f1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>



On Mar 26, 9:30 pm, "Bob Jones" <em..._at_me.not> wrote:
> "Mladen Gogala" <gogala.mla..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:gqh502$q0h$2_at_solani.org...
>
> > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:24:28 -0500, Michael Austin wrote:
>
> >> They are morons and should be relieved of their duties and COMPETENT
> >> talent hired to replace them.
>
> > I would disagree, and bitterly so. There are reasons for using hot
> > backups, especially in this economy.
>
> Hot backup and economy? That's ingenious.

Well, I've used RMAN before, and I'm all for it. There is so much it does and takes care of for you which a Hot Backup cannot. But, these other nuts want to switch and I'm hoping to get a bunch of reasons why not to switch from all of you.......

Thanks! Received on Fri Mar 27 2009 - 10:01:46 CDT

Original text of this message