Re: Ouch...
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:57:54 +1100
Message-ID: <gotg47$vk7$1_at_news.motzarella.org>
jgar the jorrible wrote,on my timestamp of 7/03/2009 10:39 AM:
> On Mar 5, 1:47 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> Prolly explains this too: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/mostadmired/2009/snapshots/5000.html
>
> :-D
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:57:54 +1100
Message-ID: <gotg47$vk7$1_at_news.motzarella.org>
jgar the jorrible wrote,on my timestamp of 7/03/2009 10:39 AM:
> On Mar 5, 1:47 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123602020984611931.html
>
> Prolly explains this too: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/mostadmired/2009/snapshots/5000.html
>
> :-D
Oh yes. That reminded me of a book out in the 90s on the 10 most desirable companies to work for. IBM was there of course, together with Apple. So was Prime, DEC, Compaq and a few others in the same class... ;) Received on Sat Mar 07 2009 - 03:57:54 CST