Re: Re-design of data storage table
From: Michael Austin <maustin_at_firstdbasource.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:40:08 -0600
Message-ID: <gTool.20951$Ws1.10491_at_nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>
Palooka wrote:
> Mxyplx wrote:
>
> Yup. That pretty much sums it up.
>
> Palooka
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:40:08 -0600
Message-ID: <gTool.20951$Ws1.10491_at_nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>
Palooka wrote:
> Mxyplx wrote:
>> >> A really good horror story about this kind of disaster is at: >> >> http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/opinion-pieces/bad-carma/
>
> Yup. That pretty much sums it up.
>
> Palooka
I have seen one other application that was similar - basically you had table/rows that described the data and there was another set of tables that contained the data. This one actually functioned pretty well... but as I recall was a royal pain to maintain. Received on Sun Feb 22 2009 - 21:40:08 CST