Re: Which SQL is the best for servers?
From: Serge Rielau <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:41:30 -0500
Message-ID: <6vu8crFlurl4U1_at_mid.individual.net>
Matthias Hoys wrote:
>> Should you choose an open-source, make sure your code AND your DDL uses as
>> much ANSI standards as possible so when you do need to move to something
>> else, it won't be as painful. (auto-incrementing columns vs. sequences
>> etc...).
Nothing like a serious addiction combined with a single source to get your fix to loose a lot of money...
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:41:30 -0500
Message-ID: <6vu8crFlurl4U1_at_mid.individual.net>
Matthias Hoys wrote:
>> Should you choose an open-source, make sure your code AND your DDL uses as
>> much ANSI standards as possible so when you do need to move to something
>> else, it won't be as painful. (auto-incrementing columns vs. sequences
>> etc...).
> > I really wouldn't go for database independence ... Choose a RDBMS and use > all of its features !
Nothing like a serious addiction combined with a single source to get your fix to loose a lot of money...
-- Serge Rielau DB2 Solutions Development IBM Toronto LabReceived on Mon Feb 16 2009 - 16:41:30 CST