Re: HP and Oracle Team.The alliance of the Kings.
From: Carlos <miotromailcarlos_at_netscape.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c01da80a-a06a-430c-8adc-708cdf36ea80_at_t13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
On 6 feb, 16:38, Michael Austin <maus..._at_firstdbasource.com> wrote:
> I "have been told" (big grain of salt applied) that the same
> query executed on a Niteeza and Teradata server was killed after 23+ hrs
> and completed in 43 seconds on the Exadata server. 4x2TB tables
> joined w/no indexing looking for specific data.
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c01da80a-a06a-430c-8adc-708cdf36ea80_at_t13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
On 6 feb, 16:38, Michael Austin <maus..._at_firstdbasource.com> wrote:
> I "have been told" (big grain of salt applied) that the same
> query executed on a Niteeza and Teradata server was killed after 23+ hrs
> and completed in 43 seconds on the Exadata server. 4x2TB tables
> joined w/no indexing looking for specific data.
Are you serious? Which Teradata SW/HW configuration? On the DW arena, Teradata is years before Oracle. (especially on +10 TB area). 'Shared Nothing' rules for DW!
Cheers.
Carlos. Received on Tue Feb 10 2009 - 06:14:07 CST