Re: Help required - URGENT PLS

From: Ruud de Koter <nobody_at_internet.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:52:39 +0100
Message-ID: <496bbb9a$0$189$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>

balu wrote:
> On Jan 12, 7:24 am, Charles Hooper <hooperc2..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:

>> On Jan 11, 5:23 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry Charles you have to pay oracle for support to be able to
>>> "legitimately" apply patches.  One of the guys who still posts here
>>> quite a bit at one point was working for an organization where somehow
>>> he had access to patchsets but claimed he did not have to operate
>>> under the metalink support contract framework but that sounded pretty
>>> shaky.
>>> Looks like the guy famous for bleeding all over New York is trying to
>>> throw some heat on Jeff Hunter and Nuno as some kind of backwards
>>> publicity for his "business".  As long as you can solve all your
>>> problems by firing silver bullets and not using any oracle software
>>> besides the base releases ... well caveat emptor.
>> hpuxrac,
>>
>> Good point regarding the need to maintain a support contract to
>> install patches, and to access Metalink content - it seems that the
>> article I referenced in my previous reply completely missed that small
>> fact when describing the merits of dismissing Oracle support in favor
>> of support offered by that consulting company.
>>
>> On that point, I leave you with a final quote, "Oracle does not run in
>> a vacuum.":http://books.google.com/books?id=Wx6OmllCfIkC&pg=PA45
>>
>> Charles Hooper
>> IT Manager/Oracle DBA
>> K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

>
> To Mladen Gogala,
>
> I have seen you many times replying oracle posts in very ODD manner .
> I request if you think so that you are not paid by replying to this
> post .. please do not reply its very simple.
>
> Regards
>
> Balakrishna.
>

Now there 's an odd reply! Is this becoming a moderated group?

Don't think so, do you?

Ruud. Received on Mon Jan 12 2009 - 15:52:39 CST