Re: gc buffer busy and rac testing

From: Mladen Gogala <>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:51:47 +0100
Message-ID: <gk7373$k8r$>

Palooka wrote:

> Your remarks about RAC being for resilience and availability, rather
> than performance and scalability, are interesting. No disagreement
> whatsoever from here, but that isn't how Oracle/Captain Morgan/Sybrand
> sell it.

I work for neither of them and had disagreements with both of them. Why would I be in any way obligated by their statements?

Received on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 02:51:47 CST

Original text of this message