Re: gc buffer busy and rac testing
From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:51:47 +0100
Message-ID: <gk7373$k8r$2_at_news.motzarella.org>
Palooka wrote:
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:51:47 +0100
Message-ID: <gk7373$k8r$2_at_news.motzarella.org>
Palooka wrote:
> Your remarks about RAC being for resilience and availability, rather
> than performance and scalability, are interesting. No disagreement
> whatsoever from here, but that isn't how Oracle/Captain Morgan/Sybrand
> sell it.
>
I work for neither of them and had disagreements with both of them. Why would I be in any way obligated by their statements?
-- http://mgogala.freehostia.comReceived on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 02:51:47 CST