Re: asm on san

From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <0f0363b3-e0f6-48c6-882a-3f1d27fdfcf5@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>


On Dec 13, 4:21 pm, Robert Klemme <shortcut..._at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 13.12.2008 23:28, hpuxrac wrote:
>
> Basically they say, find out for yourself.  Which is probably right,
> given the different requirements of systems and the vast number of
> options (especially since they change all the time).

"At this time Oracle believes that these three specialized storage technologies are well understood by the customers, are very mature, and the Oracle technology requirements are well know"

Sounds more like they are saying we shouldn't even be having this conversation because "everyone knows" what is right! :-)

Palooka wrote:

> Yes, but just to act devil's advocate for a moment, maybe a DW isn't the
> best test - typically the writes will be part of a batch process, and
> operational response is measured largely against reads.

I'd think a load window broken by saturated cache might get some operational types attention! :-)

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2008/dec/15/889383753-science-helps-santa/?zIndex=22740
Received on Mon Dec 15 2008 - 18:32:35 CST

Original text of this message