Re: asm on san
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:51:07 -0800
Message-ID: <1229374266.882062@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
>
> Maybe you're right. I have some experience with RAID-5 configurations
> and I must admit that NetApp RAID 5 did perform well for a DW
> configuration.
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:51:07 -0800
Message-ID: <1229374266.882062@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:25:20 +0000, Palooka wrote:
>
>> I think Michael Austin is right. We are just consumers of the SAN >> service. These days, we can no longer think in terms of spindles - too >> much is abstracted and virtualised.
>
> Maybe you're right. I have some experience with RAID-5 configurations
> and I must admit that NetApp RAID 5 did perform well for a DW
> configuration.
NetApps are, by default, a proprietary form of RAID4. Did you reconfigure it?
-- Daniel A. Morgan Oracle Ace Director & Instructor University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Mon Dec 15 2008 - 14:51:07 CST