Re: asm on san

From: hpuxrac <johnbhurley_at_sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:54:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <96eace8a-727c-4b43-9f04-8b2ff5d2158f@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com>


On Dec 12, 3:07 pm, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:

snip

> It is more than just when it is in degraded mode. RAID5 has substantial
> negative impacts on performance all of the time the system is not idle.
>
> James Morle, at UKOUG, pointed out that a similar issue exists with the
> new Solid State drives too making them problematic for small writes.
>
> If you shackle a system with RAID5 today, and later need the horsepower,
> you will find it almost impossible, from a practical standpoint, to get
> off RAID5. Better to say NO! now than later.
>
> If they can't afford the disk ... the data isn't that important.
>
> This is not to say backups couldn't be sitting on RAID5. But operational
> datafiles? redo log files? No way.

Lots of posturing here ... wonder if anyone has ever posted that RAID 5 is fine and running on Apple storage hardware is what everyone is going to ...

Doesn't smell good from certain contributors to this thread ... Received on Fri Dec 12 2008 - 18:54:57 CST

Original text of this message