Re: asm on san
From: helter skelter <helterskelter_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:10:16 +0100
Message-ID: <ghr7fv$olv$1@mx1.internetia.pl>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm preparing to test some configurations on san storage array. I would
>> like to find out what will be better in my environment: raid1+0 or raid5.
>> Other thing is what size of segment size should be configured on storage
>> array. For example, I've got 5 disks in RAID5, so if ASM default stripe
>> size for datafiles is 1MB, so segment size on strage shouls be 256KB to
>> hit all drives, am I right?
>> What tools are You recommend to do tests like this: sequentail/sequence
>> reads etc? thanks
>>
>> oracle 10gr2, rhel5
I know that :) but that wasn't the question Received on Thu Dec 11 2008 - 08:10:16 CST
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:10:16 +0100
Message-ID: <ghr7fv$olv$1@mx1.internetia.pl>
gym dot scuba dot kennedy at gmail pisze:
> "helter skelter" <helterskelter_at_gmail.com> wrote in message > news:ghr11l$vfm$1_at_mx1.internetia.pl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm preparing to test some configurations on san storage array. I would
>> like to find out what will be better in my environment: raid1+0 or raid5.
>> Other thing is what size of segment size should be configured on storage
>> array. For example, I've got 5 disks in RAID5, so if ASM default stripe
>> size for datafiles is 1MB, so segment size on strage shouls be 256KB to
>> hit all drives, am I right?
>> What tools are You recommend to do tests like this: sequentail/sequence
>> reads etc? thanks
>>
>> oracle 10gr2, rhel5
> If you are using asm then the disks will be raw. > Jim > >
I know that :) but that wasn't the question Received on Thu Dec 11 2008 - 08:10:16 CST