Re: 10g data pump question
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:03:55 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 25, 2:00 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 8:02 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
> > > > Yep, I missed it. I guess you've shown parallel is silly with
> > > > network_link.
> > > Au contraire mon frere ... using impdp with a network link and
> > > parallel just absolutely rocks.
> > Interesting, I better start trying these things. How does it not
> > bottleneck?
> Well I guess it depends on several factors ... type of network
> connection between servers ( 100 Meg versus gig ethernet for example
> going into switches ) ... and amount of bandwidth between systems ...
> and number of cores on the systems involved ... and type of IO
> subsystems attached.
> My experience using parallel between separate servers with adequate
> bandwidth has been darn good.
> Even better experience using impdp between instances on the same
> > Reference is to South Park.
> Must be too busy with running and kids activities etc I have little
> idea what South Park is ...
You have kids and you don't know what South Park is? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=south+park+peruvian+flute+band&aq=1&oq=south+park+peruv
-- @home.com is bogus. This is a worldwide group, not everyone knows all cultural references. This is a worldwide group, not everyone knows all cultural references. This is a worldwide group...Received on Tue Nov 25 2008 - 19:03:55 CST