Re: With Clause

From: raja <dextersunil_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 00:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <404fe18e-c633-4f50-ab85-845771da7caf@b2g2000prf.googlegroups.com>


On Nov 6, 3:01 am, Palooka <nob..._at_nowhere.com> wrote:
> Palooka wrote:
> > joel garry wrote:
>
> >> A few SECONDS of google:
>
> >>http://www.psoug.org/reference/with.html
> >>http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:5...
>
> >>http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/oracle9i/daily/oct10.html
> >>http://www.singlequery.com/2006/12/using-the-oracle-with-clause/
>
> >> et cetera.
>
> > Why should he waste precious seconds on Google, when people here will do
> > his work for nothing?
>
> Oh, damn. I sound like Sybrand now.
>
> Palooka- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hi,

Thanks for ur responses.
I will check these links and then if i have doubts, i will get back to you.

Should we use /*+ MATERIALIZE */ ( materialize hint ) even in 10g ?

With Regards,
Raja. Received on Thu Nov 06 2008 - 02:51:38 CST

Original text of this message