Re: Combining snapclones with DataGuard

From: Steve Howard <stevedhoward_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <df1a03a2-cdce-458b-a1bb-cfb49afbae89@q35g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>


On Oct 20, 4:20 pm, ddf <orat..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> locations.  Since in DataGuard synchronous mode the data is already in
> sync with the source, keeping copies of that data in sync with the
> DataGuard destination is a simple task (according to NetApp).  Thus,
> having multiple copies of the DataGuard database ready to restore with
> minimal notice and, apparently, downtime would be beneficial to an
> enterprise.  This would not be possible with some older versions of
> DataGuard (such as that for 9i and 9iR2) as they have no synchronous
> mode in which to run.  Thus *knowing* the release of Oracle in use

9iR2 (I don't know about 9.0.x) did have the ability to require synchronous redo transmission...

http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96653/sql_stmts.htm#1016428

Regards,

Steve Received on Mon Oct 20 2008 - 19:54:31 CDT

Original text of this message