Re: RAC or Large SMP...?

From: <mccmx_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ca8eaaea-edf9-4c7f-a7b1-a04b6421fdfe@u40g2000pru.googlegroups.com>

> Ok, just be aware though, if you don't use RAC at all, it mean downtime if
> the node crashes.- Hide quoted text -

True. That is one big advantage of RAC, TAF.

Once thing that I'm really curious about is this...

If one of the 4 x3850 chassis died (hardware failure), could we restart the server with 3 chassis and continue to operate seemlessly (albeit with 75% of the processing. power)...?

or would it require booting an alternate kernel, or modifying some boot/BIOS parameters..? Received on Wed Oct 08 2008 - 22:39:28 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Arne Ortlinghaus: "Re: ORA-12899: value too large for column with Oracle Patch 10.2.0.4"
Previous message: tritya: "RMAN incremental Backup in Oracle 10g"
In reply to: Bob Jones: "Re: RAC or Large SMP...?"
Next in thread: Bob Jones: "Re: RAC or Large SMP...?"
Reply: Bob Jones: "Re: RAC or Large SMP...?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message