Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:10:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1221099024.774316@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
>
> That may all be true, but the strange thing is
> a) vendors always manage to put the blame somewhere else
> b) bean-counters at end-users still continue to purchase that crap.
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:10:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1221099024.774316@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:42:42 +0000 (UTC), Aya the Vampire Slayer
> <ryoko_at_gatech.rmv.this.part.edu> wrote:
>
>> In any case, the customer made their decision, and Palooka should >> probably stick within the bounds set by the vendor of the pile-of-crap >> application, even if it's terrible and nonsensical. (I am making the >> assumption here that Palooka's essentially a contractor hired by the >> customer to set up the environment for some vendor's pile-of-crap >> application)
>
> That may all be true, but the strange thing is
> a) vendors always manage to put the blame somewhere else
> b) bean-counters at end-users still continue to purchase that crap.
And DBAs will continue to get paid to keep the ship from sinking.
What a world.
-- Daniel A. Morgan Oracle Ace Director & Instructor University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:10:24 CDT