Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:35:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1220927736.68586@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

Palooka wrote:

> And again, thank you. Besides which, there are actually some reasons not
> to go with RAC. Firstly, the application vendor doesn't actually support
> it.

That explains not going with RAC. Now can you explain why going with HACMP, which costs money, makes more sense than going with Data Guard which doesn't.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Mon Sep 08 2008 - 21:35:36 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: DA Morgan: "Re: design question"
Previous message: gym dot scuba dot kennedy at gmail: "Re: design question"
In reply to: Palooka: "Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?"
Next in thread: hpuxrac: "Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message