Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?

From: <>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:44:56 +0200
Message-ID: <>

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:19:11 +0100, Palooka <> wrote:

>Besides which, there are actually some reasons not
>to go with RAC. Firstly, the application vendor doesn't actually support

That would be the perfect reason to replace the application. RAC is transparent to the application.
If a vendor states
'We don't support RAC'
this likely means 'My application is unscalable and it mightily sucks' Note most application vendors still promote the 'database independent' fairy tale, and a whole lot of so-called DBAs rather manage a mess and get fired in the end, than to set up things professionally. You seem to be no exception to this rule. Your case is lost, yet you continue to defend it. You will notice your case is lost SOON. Let's only pray Herr Weber is there to help you out.

Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Mon Sep 08 2008 - 16:44:56 CDT

Original text of this message