Re: design question

From: Ana C. Dent <anacedent_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:19:29 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns9B10CEC0E2AFDanacedenthotmailcom@69.16.185.247>

"Chris Seidel" <cseidel_at_arcor.de> wrote in news:48c139ff$0$11091$9b4e6d93_at_newsspool1.arcor-online.net:

> It is not necessary to access the data otherwise than via the java
> application.

A more correct statement would be as follows:

I don't now think it necessary to access the data otherwise than via the java application, but who knows what the future may require. Received on Fri Sep 05 2008 - 22:19:29 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: William Robertson: "Re: TRIGGER"
Previous message: DA Morgan: "Re: global context instead of for update or another idea ?"
In reply to: Chris Seidel: "Re: design question"
Next in thread: DA Morgan: "Re: design question"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message