Re: global context instead of for update or another idea ?

From: hopehope_123 <hopehope_123_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a1ef5c34-d346-463d-89b4-686ae0b7364c@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>

Hi,

thank you very much for your answers. What i understand from your posts is that i need to rethink my issue .

thx again.

(may be , i can ask one more, what happens if i write a java stored procedure which uses global variables inside (as static ) ... but first i need to know more about this...... , better forget .)

hope Received on Fri Sep 05 2008 - 16:57:00 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl: "Re: RMAN"
Previous message: artmerar_at_yahoo.com: "RMAN"
In reply to: DA Morgan: "Re: global context instead of for update or another idea ?"
Next in thread: DA Morgan: "Re: global context instead of for update or another idea ?"
Reply: DA Morgan: "Re: global context instead of for update or another idea ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message