Re: why ora1801
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
> The two systems could have different NLS_DATE_FORMAT ;
> ignoring the fact each piece mentioned above is unsupported.
the NLS_DATE_FORMAT in both systems is same
both in unix enviroment and oracle session parameter.
If I change the tbl_txn_mon_t.sa_comm_date to 81, ora-1801 disappear. So ora1801 in my sco system should be result of the wrong length of tbl_txn_mon_t.sa_comm_date.
Why oracle not report 1801, instead of "the sa_comm_date is too
And why Aix not report 1801? Received on Fri Jul 04 2008 - 19:16:13 CDT