Re: Crossing over from SQL Server
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 13, 11:19 am, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
> >> - Show quoted text -
> > Fair point but here is the challenge with Daniel is saying. His data
> > is spot on AND relevant to all SQL Server versions up to and including
> > 6.5.
> Your argument is roughly equivalent to someone claiming the US
> Constitution is not based on the Magna Carta because it was rewritten.
> The underlying architecture has not changed: Just the code that
> implements it.
> Daniel A. MorganOracleAce Director & Instructor
> University of Washington
> damor..._at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget SoundOracleUsers Groupwww.psoug.org- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Your funny when you are in such deep denial mode.
Yes the architecture changed, unless you want to argue that the existence of core aspects such as storage layer, query processor, network stack are the architecture layer, in which case I think we can safely say that Oracle and SQL Server and DB2 and Informix all have the same architecture.
-Euan Received on Fri Jun 13 2008 - 22:28:50 CDT