Re: Crossing over from SQL Server
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:40:11 -0700
>> SQL Server >> ----------------- >> Well we all know how this came about don't we so need to dredge up the dirt.
> You know Daniel you continue to disapoint. The fact that you are
> teaching cross-over courses and yet still peddling this stuff is
> tragic. We've had this many times, yes a version of Sybase was based
> on the Ingres project and a version(actually set of versions) of SQL
> Server was based on Sybase but I once again refer you to this entry
> which explains the re-architecture work done starting with SQL 7 that
> makes this linking of yours beyond even tenous.
Both Oracle and Sybase can throw away 100% of their code bases and that would be irrelevant to the point I am making. What has been recoded still uses the same read consistency model, transaction architecture, the same locking model: Nor has the verbiage changed.
If you have specific facts that you can point to that show, for example undo/rollback segments in SQL Server, I am sure we would all be interested.
PS: Disappointing you is not one of the criteria I use when deciding what to post.
-- Daniel A. Morgan Oracle Ace Director & Instructor University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Fri Jun 13 2008 - 12:40:11 CDT