Re: "desperately tiny" rdbms setup
From: Gints Plivna <gints.plivna_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3a0a8368-8190-4c72-9dd4-b2687b30b4c3@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3a0a8368-8190-4c72-9dd4-b2687b30b4c3@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
On 16 Maijs, 11:03, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> 1GB laptop would default to 700MB for Oracle. Why aim for 32MB?!?
> about 100M is workable, and even allows for some options.
> I have been working 512MB~1GB XP laptops with the database, Designer
> and iAS (pl/sql) running. Nothing to be jealous about, but more
> workable than my current 4GB Vista (yuck!)
I worked with XE on my ancient laptop with 256 RAM, ~700MHz. SGA was 140M, for syntax checking and some tests it was quite ok, even created tables with a few million rows and count(*) worked :) Don't remember probably Oracle something sceptical said upon install :)
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
Received on Tue May 20 2008 - 13:59:18 CDT