Re: Oracle vs OS Memory Utilization

From: unixoracle <nowhere_at_nospam.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 17:25:42 -0500
Message-ID: <ddudnYA0r77wUrnVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@giganews.com>

"ROAL" <ralbertson_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:4cd15746-7510-41d6-8368-20c98938640c_at_r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>I have a Solaris server V445 running:
> 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V445
>
> The server has 8G of memory. However TOP only is showing 700M
> available.

Filsystem cache? Not familiar with Solaris, but the defaults for FS cache can be very high on other OS's.

Hth Received on Fri May 09 2008 - 17:25:42 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Smith: "Re: Oracle chief architect says there ought to be one Linux distribution: Red Hat"
Previous message: hpuxrac: "Re: Oracle chief architect says there ought to be one Linux distribution: Red Hat"
In reply to: ROAL: "Oracle vs OS Memory Utilization"
Next in thread: hpuxrac: "Re: Oracle vs OS Memory Utilization"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message