Re: Oracle memory allocation on Linux 2.6

From: NetComrade <netcomradeNSPAM_at_bookexchange.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:39:19 GMT
Message-ID: <8ec704dljslpisgjitqvtqqs5h272bq34o@4ax.com>

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:24:54 -0700 (PDT), vitalisman_at_gmail.com wrote:

>On 2 avr, 18:16, NetComrade <netcomradeNS..._at_bookexchange.net> wrote:
>
>> >Do you have FILSYSTEMIO_OPTIONS set to either "SETALL" or "DIRECTIO"?
>> >In my experience, that will significantly reduce the use of caches.
>>
>> Have you tried playing with Veritas/ODM?
>
>I've never used ODM. But is it compatible with OCFS2?

Sorry, no clue.. my understanding with OCFS, an oracle supplied FS, double buffering shouldn't be an issue... but i never used it... was 'fortunate' enough to work with ADM
.......
We run Oracle 9iR2,10gR2, 10g2RAC on RH4/RH5 and Solaris 10 (Sparc) We use RMAN and remote catalog for backups Received on Mon Apr 14 2008 - 14:39:19 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: NetComrade: "Re: Multiple databases - best performance scenario"
Previous message: fitzjarrell_at_cox.net: "Re: controlling order of data import through sql loader"
In reply to: vitalisman_at_gmail.com: "Re: Oracle memory allocation on Linux 2.6"
Next in thread: vitalisman_at_gmail.com: "Re: Oracle memory allocation on Linux 2.6"
Reply: vitalisman_at_gmail.com: "Re: Oracle memory allocation on Linux 2.6"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message