Re: A small gig requiring you to know Oracle Model clause

From: Shakespeare <>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:23:05 +0200
Message-ID: <47fa6668$0$14350$>

"" <> schreef in bericht On Apr 4, 5:18 pm, hpuxrac <> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, joel garry <> wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 3:19 pm, hpuxrac <> wrote:
> > > Looked to me like a typical Captain Morgan post where his signature is
> > > longer than the reply. But of course then he can keep self promoting
> > > eh?
> > Is there something wrong with self promoting?
> > jg
> > --
> > is
> > bogus.,,2261683,00.html
> Captain Morgan likes to complain about spam but he is the chief
> contributor in this newsgroup. In my opinion anyhow. Rarely but
> sometimes he actually does contribute something useful ... what is
> your opinion?

-I believe yours is an opinion of one (making it a minority), and does
-not accurately reflect Daniel Morgan's posting history.  Possibly you
-can define what you consider spam and illustrate that concept from
-Daniel Morgan's posts.  Then, again, possibly you cannot.

-David Fitzjarrell

Looks I've started something here...
The only thing I wanted to point out (with a <g>, did you notice) is that at te same time in one group DA was asking a 'spammer' for an aplogy, and here he was responding in a somewhat spammy way (not really, just trying to be helpful I guess).

I think asking for apologies to spammers is not useful. Most of the time, spammers do not respond; and IF they do, they will spam again like Datawarehose Job did. That was the one I was aiming at here. see CDO.misc.

As for DA's signature: many times it IS the answer to a question. Morgan's library is helpful for those nub's asking questions here. I think.....

Shakespeare Received on Mon Apr 07 2008 - 13:23:05 CDT

Original text of this message