Re: A small gig requiring you to know Oracle Model clause
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:23:05 +0200
Message-ID: <47fa6668$0$14350$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"fitzjarrell_at_cox.net" <oratune_at_msn.com> schreef in bericht
news:523cd5ef-6cd2-46af-9fbf-7de684290461_at_m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 4, 5:18 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 3, 3:19 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > > Looked to me like a typical Captain Morgan post where his signature is
> > > longer than the reply. But of course then he can keep self promoting
> > > eh?
>
> > Is there something wrong with self promoting?
>
> > jg
> > --
> > @home.com is
> > bogus.http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,2261683,00.html
>
> Captain Morgan likes to complain about spam but he is the chief
> contributor in this newsgroup. In my opinion anyhow. Rarely but
> sometimes he actually does contribute something useful ... what is
> your opinion?
-I believe yours is an opinion of one (making it a minority), and does -not accurately reflect Daniel Morgan's posting history. Possibly you -can define what you consider spam and illustrate that concept from -Daniel Morgan's posts. Then, again, possibly you cannot.
-David Fitzjarrell
Looks I've started something here...
The only thing I wanted to point out (with a <g>, did you notice) is that at
te same time in one group DA was asking a 'spammer' for an aplogy, and here
he was responding in a somewhat spammy way (not really, just trying to be
helpful I guess).
I think asking for apologies to spammers is not useful. Most of the time, spammers do not respond; and IF they do, they will spam again like Datawarehose Job did. That was the one I was aiming at here. see CDO.misc.
As for DA's signature: many times it IS the answer to a question. Morgan's library is helpful for those nub's asking questions here. I think.....
Shakespeare Received on Mon Apr 07 2008 - 13:23:05 CDT