Re: Enterprise manager with 11g?

On Mar 23, 1:23 am, gnewsgroup <gnewsgr..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 1:13 am, gnewsgroup <gnewsgr..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 11:53 pm, "Ana C. Dent" <anaced..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > gnewsgroup <gnewsgr..._at_gmail.com> wrote in news:1c208d01-2095-4df1-98d7-
> > > b7e6579d9..._at_2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com:
>
> > > > Does Oracle 11g come with the 10g-like enterprise manager? I cannot
> > > > find it, and I cannot check outhttp://localhost:5500/emor
> > > >http://127.0.0.1:5500/em.
>
> > > > Any idea? Thanks.
>
> > > cat /home/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1/install/portlist.ini
> > > Ultra Search HTTP port number =5620
> > > Enterprise Manager Console HTTP Port (orcl) = 1158
> > > Enterprise Manager Agent Port (orcl) = 3938
>
> > Yes, thank you. I also found this portlist.ini file and see that it is
> > actually port number 1158. BTW, mine is on WinXp pro with SP2.
>
> > I think that the oracle db console service is for this enterprise
> > manager, right? I have difficulty turning on this service. Click on
> > the following link to see the problem:
>
> >http://gnewsgroup.googlepages.com/problemwithdbconsoleservice
>
> As a follow-up, I checked the Event Viewer, and I see this:
>
> The description for Event ID ( 12 ) in Source ( Oracle.oracle11g )
> cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary
> registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a
> remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to
> retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The
> following information is part of the event: oracle11g.
>
> But, not sure what it means and where I use that /AUXSOURCE=flag
> stuff.

Somehow, this oracledbconsoleoracle11g service gets started, at least the services window shows that its status is "started".

I then tried to check out http://localhost:1158/em, but guess what, only get this a few un-readable characters. See below for the screen shot.

http://gnewsgroup.googlepages.com/em

I viewed the html source. It turns out that there those messy characters are all there is in the source, not a single html tag is there. Received on Sun Mar 23 2008 - 00:37:27 CDT