Re: sql problem
From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:55:34 +0100
Message-ID: <b736f$47e2b326$524b5c40$32682@cache6.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
> This means your so-called 'key' is not a key.
> Your design is fundamentally flawed.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:55:34 +0100
Message-ID: <b736f$47e2b326$524b5c40$32682@cache6.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:47:32 -0700 (PDT), marfi95 <marfi95_at_yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So, for example, Table1 could have 2 >> rows per key, while Table2 could have 3 rows per key.
> This means your so-called 'key' is not a key.
> Your design is fundamentally flawed.
No, Sybrand - it's the "universal model" 8|
*sigh* will they ever learn.
-- Regards, Frank van Bortel Top-posting in UseNet newsgroups is one way to shut me upReceived on Thu Mar 20 2008 - 13:55:34 CDT