Re: Oracle on Windows vs Solaris or Linux ?
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:45:20 +0100
> On Mar 17, 4:36 pm, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com>
>> Arch wrote: >>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:25:49 -0000, "Tony Rogerson" >>> <tonyroger..._at_torver.net> wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> The biggest benefit of Windows Server 2008 is it's virtualisation and in >>>> addtion the Hyper V stuff that will RTM in a few months time - it's going to >>>> kick hell out of VMWare. >>> That's assuming they get the virtualization working. >> OK - MicroSoft Windows 2008 server is out of the advisory list >> for my customers... Virtualization == !Oracle support... >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> Frank van Bortel >> >> Top-posting in UseNet newsgroups is one way to shut me up
> A thread in the Forums on Metalink requesting info on this subject was
> closed out yesterday with no useful information being reported.
> (Oracle) Support doesn't know or isn't providing the information yet.
Just had a customers SR closed because of HP UX virtualization was being used - be warned: iAS 10.1.3 opmn does go bezerk.
Comment was Support would consider looking into the issue once we could reproduce on non-virtualized machinery. Which is, and has always been the standpoint.
-- Regards, Frank van Bortel Top-posting in UseNet newsgroups is one way to shut me upReceived on Tue Mar 18 2008 - 15:45:20 CDT