Re: Oracle on Windows vs Solaris or Linux ?

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:45:20 +0100
Message-ID: <482e4$47e029e1$524b5c40$18585@cache1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>

bdbafh wrote:
> On Mar 17, 4:36 pm, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com>
> wrote:

>> Arch wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:25:49 -0000, "Tony Rogerson"
>>> <tonyroger..._at_torver.net> wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> The biggest benefit of Windows Server 2008 is it's virtualisation and in
>>>> addtion the Hyper V stuff that will RTM in a few months time - it's going to
>>>> kick hell out of VMWare.
>>> That's assuming they get the virtualization working.
>> OK - MicroSoft Windows 2008 server is out of the advisory list
>> for my customers... Virtualization == !Oracle support...
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>> Frank van Bortel
>>
>> Top-posting in UseNet newsgroups is one way to shut me up

>
> A thread in the Forums on Metalink requesting info on this subject was
> closed out yesterday with no useful information being reported.
>
> (Oracle) Support doesn't know or isn't providing the information yet.
>
> -bdbafh

Just had a customers SR closed because of HP UX virtualization was being used - be warned: iAS 10.1.3 opmn does go bezerk.

Comment was Support would consider looking into the issue once we could reproduce on non-virtualized machinery. Which is, and has always been the standpoint.

-- 

Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting in UseNet newsgroups is one way to shut me up

Received on Tue Mar 18 2008 - 15:45:20 CDT