Re: tool comparing statspacks

From: NetComrade <netcomradeNSPAM_at_bookexchange.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:24:10 GMT
Message-ID: <8o2ut3lflr8nea6s8e3fo336vb72l0g3e8@4ax.com>


On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:47:48 GMT, NetComrade <netcomradeNSPAM_at_bookexchange.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:48:54 -0700 (PDT), Niall Litchfield
><niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 16, 12:06špm, Eric Junkermann <e..._at_deptj.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the statspack report is just a script reading the statspack
>>> tables, why don't you look at the script, look at the tables, and roll
>>> your own report.
>>
>>Looking at the statspack script, and the associated package, and
>>entirely understanding it, is a little more complex than that raw
>>sentence suggests. Especially if you have to compare and contrast
>>different versions of statspack at maybe different levels.
>>
>>Niall
>
>Thanks.. I've written some ugly SQL comparing some parts of
>statspacks, but was curious if anyone wrote any tools.. I certainly
>want to be re-inventing the wheel.

That should've read '_don't_ want to be re-inventing the wheel'

.......
We run Oracle 9iR2,10gR2, 10g2RAC on RH4/RH5 and Solaris 10 (Sparc) remove NSPAM to email Received on Mon Mar 17 2008 - 19:24:10 CDT

Original text of this message