Re: testing memory parameters

From: Ana C. Dent <anacedent_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:04:57 GMT
Message-ID: <J3fDj.6008$GW5.5426@newsfe12.phx>

"mr..._at_gmail.com" <mrowkin_at_gmail.com> wrote in news:62772aa8-fdbd-42b7- a8a0-da91957e30e9_at_e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> I think that I should consider buffer and library cache hit ratios.
> Is this a good way?

BUFFER CACHE HIT RATIO ia a mythical indicator of performance. It should be ignored because it is meaningless. Received on Sun Mar 16 2008 - 15:04:57 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: mtek_at_mtekusa.com: "Re: Oracle Patches"
Previous message: Jerry Stuckle: "Re: consolidation of multiple rows"
In reply to: mr..._at_gmail.com: "testing memory parameters"
Next in thread: DA Morgan: "Re: testing memory parameters"
Reply: DA Morgan: "Re: testing memory parameters"
Reply: Shakespeare: "Re: testing memory parameters"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message