Re: wrong index IX_SEL?
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8dcc484e-26fc-45be-a07c-77154eded135@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 10, 11:13 am, "jog..._at_gmail.com" <jog..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't know how the optimizer has calculated ix_sel of the index
> IDT_FCMO_TMS.
> Oracle version: 10.2.0.3.0
> Any idea?
>
> ***************************************
> BASE STATISTICAL INFORMATION
> ***********************
> Table Stats::
> Table: TDTC_CAPACIDAD_MODALIDAD Alias: TDTC_CAPACIDAD_MODALIDAD
> #Rows: 82240 #Blks: 1132 AvgRowLen: 82.00
> Index Stats::
> Index: IDT_FCMO_CHA Col#: 5
> LVLS: 1 #LB: 170 #DK: 939 LB/K: 1.00 DB/K: 14.00 CLUF:
> 13425.00
> Index: IDT_FCMO_TMS Col#: 3
> 4 <-----
> the index
> LVLS: 1 #LB: 214 #DK: 471 LB/K: 1.00 DB/K: 26.00 CLUF:
> 12648.00 <----- the index
> Index: IDT_FCMO_TSU Col#: 31
> LVLS: 0 #LB: 1 #DK: 58 LB/K: 1.00 DB/K: 6.00 CLUF: 370.00
> Index: RDT_PCMO Col#: 1 2
> LVLS: 1 #LB: 206 #DK: 82061 LB/K: 1.00 DB/K: 1.00 CLUF:
> 28928.00
> ***************************************
> SINGLE TABLE ACCESS PATH
> Column (#3): CMO_CODTSG(VARCHAR2)
> AvgLen: 3.00 NDV: 21 Nulls: 0 Density: 0.047619 <----------
> first column of the index
> Column (#4): CMO_CODTMS(VARCHAR2)
> AvgLen: 5.00 NDV: 387 Nulls: 0 Density: 0.002584 <----------
> second column of the index
> Table: TDTC_CAPACIDAD_MODALIDAD Alias:
> TDTC_CAPACIDAD_MODALIDAD
> Card: Original: 82240 Rounded: 10 Computed: 10.12 Non Adjusted:
> 10.12
> Access Path: TableScan
> Cost: 184.60 Resp: 184.60 Degree: 0
> Cost_io: 181.00 Cost_cpu: 29454495
> Resp_io: 181.00 Resp_cpu: 29454495
> Access Path: index (index (FFS))
> Index: IDT_FCMO_TMS
> resc_io: 36.00 resc_cpu: 15484960
> ix_sel: 0.0000e+00 ix_sel_with_filters: 1
> Access Path: index (FFS)
> Cost: 37.89 Resp: 37.89 Degree: 1
> Cost_io: 36.00 Cost_cpu: 15484960
> Resp_io: 36.00 Resp_cpu: 15484960
> Access Path: index (AllEqRange)
> Index: IDT_FCMO_TMS
> resc_io: 1.00 resc_cpu: 42971
> ix_sel: 0.0021231 ix_sel_with_filters: 0.0021231
> <-------------------- wrong ix_sel?
> Cost: 1.01 Resp: 1.01 Degree: 1
> Best:: AccessPath: IndexRange Index: IDT_FCMO_TMS
> Cost: 1.01 Degree: 1 Resp: 1.01 Card: 10.12 Bytes: 0
> ***************************************
>
> IX_SEL should be 0.047619 * 0.002584 = 0.000005859398712024
> Am i wrong?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Joaquín González
What was the query which generated this 10053 trace?
David Fitzjarrell Received on Mon Mar 10 2008 - 12:48:15 CDT