Re: History behind 30 character name limit?

From: codadilupo <>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:36:44 +0100
Message-ID: <47d0017c$0$16024$>

gazzag wrote:

>> Because "30 characters ought to be enough for anybody"...

> You'd think so, wouldn't you?

"The more constraints one imposes, the more one frees one's self of the chains that shackle the spirit." (Stravinsky)

> Why would anyone need 256 characters, let alone more????

For the same reason they need spaces in filenames, I guess.

C. Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 08:36:44 CST

Original text of this message