Re: History behind 30 character name limit?
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:36:44 +0100
>> Because "30 characters ought to be enough for anybody"...
> You'd think so, wouldn't you?
"The more constraints one imposes, the more one frees one's self of the chains that shackle the spirit." (Stravinsky)
> Why would anyone need 256 characters, let alone more????
For the same reason they need spaces in filenames, I guess.
C. Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 08:36:44 CST