Re: History behind 30 character name limit?

From: <ricforduk_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ed598b32-b856-4367-8c10-d0ae7f92b2c3@h25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>


>
> Because "30 characters ought to be enough for anybody"...
>
> C.

When you consider they had to use the char datatype from version 2 up to (I think) 5 that limit was probably pretty reasonable... Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 07:57:38 CST

Original text of this message