Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:28:42 -0800
Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:23:26 -0800, bdbafh wrote:
>> Vladimir, >> >> It now appears to be password-locked. It will be useful for testing, but >> I certainly wouldn't want to apply it outside of testing until after it >> hits general distribution. >> >> -bdbafh
> Probably, they found another monumental blooper. If you ask me, 10.2.0.3
> is so bad that installing 10.2.0.4 is warranted, as soon as it hits the
> general distribution. So many problems with hash joins, SQL not visible
> for background processes and alike. It can't be much worse than that.
> Mladen Gogala
Obviously you have forgotten about 8.1.6. <g>
But I do think you are being a bit melodramatic. The issues in 10.2.0.3 are minor when considered against the incredible amount of work is does well.
-- Daniel A. Morgan Oracle Ace Director & Instructor University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Thu Feb 28 2008 - 02:28:42 CST