Re: 10.2.0.4
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:28:42 -0800
Message-ID: <1204187321.307401@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
>
> Probably, they found another monumental blooper. If you ask me, 10.2.0.3
> is so bad that installing 10.2.0.4 is warranted, as soon as it hits the
> general distribution. So many problems with hash joins, SQL not visible
> for background processes and alike. It can't be much worse than that.
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> http://mgogala.freehostia.com
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:28:42 -0800
Message-ID: <1204187321.307401@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
Mladen Gogala wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:23:26 -0800, bdbafh wrote:
>
>> Vladimir, >> >> It now appears to be password-locked. It will be useful for testing, but >> I certainly wouldn't want to apply it outside of testing until after it >> hits general distribution. >> >> -bdbafh
>
> Probably, they found another monumental blooper. If you ask me, 10.2.0.3
> is so bad that installing 10.2.0.4 is warranted, as soon as it hits the
> general distribution. So many problems with hash joins, SQL not visible
> for background processes and alike. It can't be much worse than that.
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> http://mgogala.freehostia.com
Obviously you have forgotten about 8.1.6. <g>
But I do think you are being a bit melodramatic. The issues in 10.2.0.3 are minor when considered against the incredible amount of work is does well.
-- Daniel A. Morgan Oracle Ace Director & Instructor University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Thu Feb 28 2008 - 02:28:42 CST