Re: Multiple listeners for MTS
From: Ana C. Dent <anacedent_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:55:42 GMT
Message-ID: <yV%wj.1289$0G7.298@newsfe10.phx>
>> > I am posting this "post" is wondering whether other people use
>> > an additional listener before or it is a "bad" idea.
>>
>> Do you realize that every NIC is a single threaded device?
>>
>> So if a LISTENER is "talking" to a client, this means that no other
>> LISTENER can be active at that same time.
>>
>> In addition, a LISTENER only comes into play to make the initial
>> connection between a client & the DB server. After the connection is
>> established, the listener has nothing to do with active sessions.
>>
>> So, explain again what benefit comes from having multiple LISTENERs.
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:55:42 GMT
Message-ID: <yV%wj.1289$0G7.298@newsfe10.phx>
"dominica_at_gmail.com" <dominica_at_gmail.com> wrote in
news:9e7ce1d8-8011-430e-b665-c24d17feaf17_at_h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
> On Feb 25, 6:53 pm, "Ana C. Dent" <anaced..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am posting this "post" is wondering whether other people use
>> > an additional listener before or it is a "bad" idea.
>>
>> Do you realize that every NIC is a single threaded device?
>>
>> So if a LISTENER is "talking" to a client, this means that no other
>> LISTENER can be active at that same time.
>>
>> In addition, a LISTENER only comes into play to make the initial
>> connection between a client & the DB server. After the connection is
>> established, the listener has nothing to do with active sessions.
>>
>> So, explain again what benefit comes from having multiple LISTENERs.
> > I actually got 2 listeners working on different ports. > One got MTS , the additional one is dedicated. > >
So, explain again what benefit comes from having multiple LISTENERs. Received on Tue Feb 26 2008 - 15:55:42 CST