Re: Multiple listeners for MTS
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <9e7ce1d8-8011-430e-b665-c24d17feaf17@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Feb 25, 6:53 pm, "Ana C. Dent" <anaced..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I am posting this "post" is wondering whether other people use
> > an additional listener before or it is a "bad" idea.
>
> Do you realize that every NIC is a single threaded device?
>
> So if a LISTENER is "talking" to a client, this means that no other
> LISTENER can be active at that same time.
>
> In addition, a LISTENER only comes into play to make the initial connection
> between a client & the DB server. After the connection is established, the
> listener has nothing to do with active sessions.
>
> So, explain again what benefit comes from having multiple LISTENERs.
I actually got 2 listeners working on different ports. One got MTS , the additional one is dedicated. Received on Tue Feb 26 2008 - 12:59:23 CST