Re: upgrade client on XP, how should the registry look?

From: Ben <benalvey_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <522c29a5-7498-4480-9f74-6c67022365de@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>


On Feb 5, 9:23 am, "shakespeare" <what..._at_xs4all.nl> wrote:
> "Ben" <benal..._at_yahoo.com> schreef in berichtnews:7505c5e8-6f63-4989-a634-0682b0c034c8_at_f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > We recently upgraded to 10.2.0.2 from 9.2.0.5 and with the client
> > upgrades we uninstalled 9.2 first and then installed & patched
> > 10.2.0.2.
> > We've had some random problems on an application server and with that
> > I decided to check the registry for oracle information. I found that
> > under local_machine->software->oracle the keys all have the old 9.2
> > information. There is then a sub folder local_machine->software-
> >>oracle->KEY_OraClient10g_1 with all the 10g information. All the
> > environment variables ORACLE_HOME, TNS_ADMIN, PATH have the 10g info.
>
> > Is it supposed to be required to manually remove all the 9i
> > information from the registry?
>
> Is this the client registry or the server registry?
>
> Shakespeare

client.

our database is on a unix server. most of our clients are windows XP machines. Received on Tue Feb 05 2008 - 08:44:14 CST

Original text of this message