Re: Windows 64-bit

On Feb 1, 6:05 am, bdbafh <bdb..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 4:15 am, "Vladimir M. Zakharychev"
>
>
>
>
>
> <vladimir.zakharyc..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 1:52 am, bdbafh <bdb..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 31, 3:48 pm, "astalavista" <nob..._at_nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > Oracle on Windows 64-bit (x64)
> > > > is an oracle 64-bit ?
>
> > > > Thanks for your help ...
>
> > >https://metalink.oracle.com
> > > login
> > > Click on the tab for "Certify".
> > > Click on the line "View Certifications by Product"
> > > Select "Database/Server" and click "Submit".
> > > Select "Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition" (or whatever is
> > > appropriate for you) and click "Submit".
> > > Under "Platform Selection" scroll to Microsoft Windows 2003 (AMD64/
> > > EM64T).
> > > Highlight it and click "Submit".
> > > Under "Additional Search Criteria" click the checkbox next to "10gR2
> > > 64-bit" and click "Submit".
> > > "Server Certifications" will be displayed.
> > > Click under the column heading of "additional info" for additional
> > > info.
>
> > > Wow. Am I sorry that I looked there (bad news about the 10.2.0.4
> > > patchset).
>
> > > -bdbafh
>
> > Hmm... Says 1st half of 2008 - what's so bad about these news? You
> > expected it earlier? :)
>
> Yes, I thought that it was due to be out in Q1 2008.
> Thats "H" as in "Hedge".
>

Jeez, at first I thought it meant on Hold, after you primed my brain for bad expectations :-)

But kudos for giving exact instructions for the OP and those of us who skirt braindeath attempting Oracle installs on machines incorrectly configured by vendors (*cough*HP*cough*).

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20080131-1827-ca-hackers-scientology.html
I'm working right next to Tustin:  http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local&id=5927317