Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:53:35 -0800
Message-ID: <1201747992.124992@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

Andrew M wrote:

> Not really. My original post still stands. Your reference to slide
> 50 of that presentation does not support anything you stated.

Not according to Julian. <g>

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Wed Jan 30 2008 - 20:53:35 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Serge Rielau: "Re: What is wrong with this????"
Previous message: DA Morgan: "Re: RAC backup questions"
In reply to: Andrew M: "Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?"
Next in thread: Andrew M: "Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?"
Reply: Andrew M: "Re: Why is VARCHAR2(4000) bad ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message