Re: Errors in Trace and Alert Files Concerning Disappearing Processes

From: Dereck L. Dietz <dietzdl_at_ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:39:58 GMT
Message-ID: <N%Rlj.264$J41.228@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>

"joel garry" <joel-garry_at_home.com> wrote in message news:6568d695-4e7f-4642-8a4f-df0d1bd3b9d1_at_i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Jan 23, 3:55 pm, "Dereck L. Dietz" <diet..._at_ameritech.net> wrote:
> Oracle 10.2.0.3.0,
> Windows 2003 Server
> 8GB Memory
> 8 CPU
> Shared Server
>
> I finally received the trace and alert files from the off-site DBA and
> went
> through them to try to figure out the root cause of the processes we've
> had
> at my workplace that just disappear.
>
> Here are two segments. Could someone possibly direct me to more details
> that I can present to my management and the off-site DBA for possible
> correction?
>
> --- trace file: tiermed_s002_1864.trc ---
>
> *** 2008-01-19 07:28:06.562
> *** ACTION NAME:(Elapsed - 4921.63 sec) 2008-01-19 07:28:06.359
> *** MODULE NAME:(PROCESS_CLAIMS: Rows - 24,450,000) 2008-01-19
> 07:28:06.359
> *** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2008-01-19 07:28:06.359
> *** SESSION ID:(35.9234) 2008-01-19 07:28:06.359
> *********START PLSQL RUNTIME DUMP************
> ***Got internal error Exception caught in pfrrun() while running PLSQL***
> ***Got ORA-3135 while running PLSQL***
> PACKAGE BODY SNDBX.HMP_LOAD:
> library unit=b02d7608 line=4640 opcode=164 static link=12011f68 scope=1
> FP=1200e028 PC=9b64ca84 Page=23 AP=12011f68 ST=1200e568
> DL0=11fde048 GF=11fde3e8 DL1=11fde208 DPF=11fde3d0 DS=9b649c90
>
> --- alert log ---
>
> Wed Jan 02 17:16:13 2008
> Errors in file d:\oracle\admin\tiermed\bdump\tiermed_s002_1864.trc:
> ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION]
> [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x0] [ADDR:0x0] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
> Wed Jan 02 17:16:58 2008
> found dead shared server 'S002', pid = (110, 1)

See metalink Note:211909.1 and open an SR. Also search on unable_to_trans_pc.

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
"Any ship can be a minesweeper. Once." - Unknown

Is this scenario possible?

An SGA which is sized too large, causing excessing virtual memory paging on 
a host operating system where the available free disk space is critically 
low which in turn could cause "memory" errors if there isn't enough free 
disk space for the virtual memory?
Received on Wed Jan 23 2008 - 19:39:58 CST

Original text of this message