Re: Response to spam

>> > >>> I know that quite often members of the group don't see the outcome
of
>> > >>> what some of us do to fight spam. Here's one positive outcome.
>>
>> > >And kudos to Daniel for showing us a positive outcome and for his
> > >diligence. And to James for understanding.
>
> > I have to agree, wholeheartedly. It is very easy to grow frustrated,
> > seeing the seemingly endless stream of spam spewed upon the forums.
>
> Very true... And in e-mail as well, luckily, I have that filtered. Worse
> solutions are floating around the net though.
>
> > That makes it easy to give up and stop sending in the abuse reports.
> > Daniel has showed us that it might not be totally futile.
>
> Yep, but as I said, I really wouldn't want to call this a "real" spammer.
>
>
>I do and I did.
>http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/browse_thread
/thread/28195d5610b67737/f8326235fb135c9c?>lnk=gst&q=jg#f8326235fb135c9c

Hmm, good call :-)

-- 
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, NexusDB, Oracle &
MS SQL Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com



>I consider people who perform actions of specific misposting in order

>to drive traffic to their sites spammers.  And not a trivial form of

>spam either, as this is the sort of thing that can become high volume

>very fast, as everyone wants to make a million dollars from other

>people googling.

>

>The ethics of me not following the google webmaster help charter is

>left as an exercise for the student.