Re: Will this configuration for RAC work properly?

"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message news:1191019381.731621_at_bubbleator.drizzle.com...
> charlie cs wrote:
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> We are trying to setup a RAC environment in our shop. One proposal is
>> like this:
>>
>> We have node A1, A2, B1, B2, and san box S1,S2
>>
>> A1,A2, S1 is on primary site, B1,B2,S2 is on disaster recovery site,
>>
>> A1,A2 is connecting to S1, B1,B2 is connecting to S2, we will connect
>> A1,A2,B1,B2 through fiber glass chennel and S1,S2 are synchronized. In
>> this way, we can put A1,A2,B1,B2 all in service, because S1,S2 holds same
>> datebase(two databases but synchornized)
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>
> How many miles between data center AS1 and data center BS2? Look
> up the details for extended RAC clusters and see if you qualify?
>
> What version of Oracle? It matters.
>
> Systems like this have been built but not the way you are describing
> it. A third site, generally NFS mount or iSCSI, is required to hold the
> voting disk and thus you need two separate fibre networks.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
> www.psoug.org

Oracle is 10.2. The location between two site is about 2 miles away. Basically we do not like one or several nodes sitting there doing nothing, we like both DR site and primary site share the work load.

Any more help?

Thanks very much Received on Sat Sep 29 2007 - 06:47:08 CDT