gerryt ha scritto:
> On Sep 21, 4:57 pm, Steve Howard <stevedhow..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 1:26 pm, Andrea <pincopa..._at_no.it> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> we have been to value some types of Oracle RAC solutions in according to
>>> which filesystem to use on SAN in cluster environment with HP-UX (or
>>> Linux) platform.
>>> HP says that there are this options to choose (in order of
>>> importance):
>>> raw device
>>> oracle ASM
>>> OCFS (only for linux)
>>> NFS in high avail.
>>> The our choice incline to ASM, because i think that this avoid problems
>>> with platform compatibility and for easier management of datafiles.
>>> I would like to know if there are some papers that explain these
>>> solutions of filesystem, also they defects.
>>> The products that we have to install are Oracle DB 10g with RAC.
>> We've had great luck with ASM on both clustered and standalone
>> databases, and ironically enough, our sysadmins *love* it.
>
> Nothing ironic about it. Less work for them apart from initial setup
> AND performance gains to boot : >
> Everybody wins. n.b. a much reviled SA type myself...
>
so, evaluate these info, ASM seems like everyone.
But which defects have ASM?
Received on Sat Sep 22 2007 - 11:55:52 CDT
