Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC

Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC

From: Andrea <pincopallo_at_no.it>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:35:39 +0200
Message-ID: <fd2k6u$8le$1@nnrp.ngi.it>


Bob Jones ha scritto:

> <an.celli_at_tiscali.it> wrote in message 
> news:1190383729.483429.150400_at_n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

>> On Sep 20, 3:08 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> RAW partitions give the best performance but take more administration
>>> and up front design.
>> design of solution will have implement by Oracle and HP, but the
>> choise of type of fs is our.
>> And i need to decide if is more useful raw device OR ASM for our
>> environment.
>> Our Env.is Hp-Ux 11i (rel.2) on Hp Blade bl860 with SAN in fiber
>> channel.
>> Is raw device more performance then ASM ? and is raw device platform
>> compatibility (I think that all OS support raw device) ?
>>
>>
>> if true, raw device is my best choise..
>>
>> thanks again
>>
> 
> ASM performs as well as raw, at least according to Oracle. I am not sure 
> what you mean by compatibility. Do you mean the ease of migrating to a 
> different platform? 
> 

yes, and i think that ASM could be easy for migration to another platform. Received on Sat Sep 22 2007 - 03:35:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US