Re: Best fs for Oracle RAC

<an.celli_at_tiscali.it> wrote in message
news:1190383729.483429.150400_at_n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 20, 3:08 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> RAW partitions give the best performance but take more administration
>> and up front design.
>
> design of solution will have implement by Oracle and HP, but the
> choise of type of fs is our.
> And i need to decide if is more useful raw device OR ASM for our
> environment.
> Our Env.is Hp-Ux 11i (rel.2) on Hp Blade bl860 with SAN in fiber
> channel.
> Is raw device more performance then ASM ? and is raw device platform
> compatibility (I think that all OS support raw device) ?
>
>
> if true, raw device is my best choise..
>
> thanks again
>

ASM performs as well as raw, at least according to Oracle. I am not sure what you mean by compatibility. Do you mean the ease of migrating to a different platform? Received on Fri Sep 21 2007 - 19:53:14 CDT